Michael Jackson Hoax Death

PLZ GIVE ME A LINK OR SOMETHING,BECAUSE UNLESS I READ IT I WON'T BELIEVE IF.

BTW-CAN INSURANCE BE PAID OUT WITHOUT THE DC BEING SIGNED?

WAS THE DC SIGNED?

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yup i would like to read it too… or see the media all over this.. cuz they arent.

MJGIRL18 said:

PLZ GIVE ME A LINK OR SOMETHING,BECAUSE UNLESS I READ IT I WON'T BELIEVE IF.

BTW-CAN INSURANCE BE PAID OUT WITHOUT THE DC BEING SIGNED?

WAS THE DC SIGNED?

HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.google.com/hostedne…..gD99RFDS01

  Screaming with you!!! 

doonbuggy said:

yup i would like to read it too… or see the media all over this.. cuz they arent.

I Googled'Michael Jackson life insurance' and there are only about 3 or 4 news sources that claim the insurance was indeed dished out.  But they all got the story from the Associated Press.  So it's pretty much the Associated Press who came out with this story.

I am surprised it's not blaring all over the TV's and Internet as “breaking news”.  What's up with that?

WAIT!  Went to wikipedia–typed in life insurance payout.

Death proceeds

Upon the insured's death, the insurer requires acceptable proof of death before it pays the claim. The normal minimum proof required is a death certificate and the insurer's claim form completed, signed (and typically notarized).^{[citation needed]} If the insured's death is suspicious and the policy amount is large, the insurer may investigate the circumstances surrounding the death before deciding whether it has an obligation to pay the claim.

YET, there is no death certificate!?!  WTF?  How could this money be released without a signed death certificate?  Also, the insurance company probably is just taking this at face value that Michael “died.”  Most people are just buying into because of the media.  I'm sure they are not telling the family they want PROOF–after that huge memorial and everything!  The insurance company is foooled like the rest of the people!

Cited from linked AP article.

Katherine Jackson's lawyers alleged in filings that Branca and McClain were “intent on keeping her in the dark as much and for as long as possible.”

Branca and McClain's legal team responded that the singer's mother had made “voluminous, burdensome and invasive discovery demands” that were impossible to meet in a short time frame.

It added that it could not produce the contract detailing Jackson's comeback tour with promoter AEG Live because of confidentiality provisions, but was willing to share the contract if Katherine Jackson agreed to the provisions. The parties were unable to agree on the terms.

The administrators' legal team also argued that it was unclear why Katherine Jackson was demanding so much information. Her subpoena and deposition notices had “all the earmarks of a protracted and expensive legal battle which does not appear to be justified,” the administrators' lawyers said in a filing.

Attorney Howard Weitzman, who represents Branca and McClain, said in a statement issued Tuesday evening that comments McMillan has made on Mrs. Jackson's behalf indicate “they want to rewrite Michael's will to make Mrs. Jackson 'Guardian of the Estate' and have her appointed as an Executor and Trustee of Michael Jackson's Estate.”

“In his will, Michael was very specific that his mother act as the Guardian of his children and that Mr. Branca and Mr. McClain be the Executors of his Will and Trustees of his trust,” Weitzman said.

********Why are Branca and Mcclain trying to keep Katherine in the dark? It took this long for her to get permanent custody as well. What's all the stalling for on the legal side?