Michael Jackson Hoax Death

Post edited 10:14 pm – July 24, 2009 by jewell

that theory does make sense. but if it was the case, why would paris have gone up there and put on a show of fake crying? even if she had already finished with all of her grieving, why would she have made all the crying noises when she could have simply done without them?

if this theory was true, it would mean michael would rather everyone think of him as a drug addict than someone who died of cancer. i just have a hard time believing that

well, i think that if the atopsy says that he had cancer,

who could blame him for taking pain relieving drugs…

my dad was addicted to loritabs big time when he passed…

and i was worried about him,

but who was i to tell him not to take them… i saw the pain he was in every day.

i don't think anyone would think of mj as an drug addict, if the results show cancer

yaya said:

if this theory was true, it would mean michael would rather everyone think of him as a drug addict than someone who died of cancer. i just have a hard time believing that

Yes, me too. And if he would be terminally ill of cancer, the coroner had to see it on the first authopsy and not only after toxic's rapport. To many things don't add up.

DawneVee said:

Interesting theory…

But…

What about the last video footage of MJ at the Staples Center rehearsing?  We all know that, that was MJ, not the O2 impersonator.

Nobody dying from cancer will get up there and rehearse like that.

…My father died too of terminal cancer so I know how some of you feel. 

exactly. if he was on his death bed, he wouldn't have been up there performing and looking healthy. plus michael knows firsthand how relentless the media is. i just feel he would have spoken of his illness simply cuz he knew the media would say any and everything about him, just like they're saying he's a junkie. i think it's one thing when you want people to think you're doing ok…but things change when you know people will start telling lies about you, so it seems michael would wanna nip in the bud the rumors about drugs and instead admit to having cancer.

This is to me the most plausible theory of all I've read, definitely . I just thought about something similar; and reading this make me feel almost sure that he's dead; maybe the fact of trying to hide the cancer is the reason of all the weird things around his death. I think that probably we'll know soon the autopsy and this will be the big surprise . Because, let's think… the last times Michael was saw on tv, pics, etc… he seemed to be a really ill man, as far as I can remember.

This remind me of a film called 'My life without me'.

Anyway, I keep in mind (a little) the theory of the hoax, until further info.

Ian Helperin is on my 'do not read anything he publishes' list.  So when I seen that UK article aned seen it was written by him I almost left it alone, but then I figured I would read just in case.

Have any of you actually read this article?  Ian claims Michael was a homosexual and had been sleeping with a slew of men and children and would dress up as a woman to go meet men in some crackwhore motel!!

COME ON PEOPLE!!!!  FOR REAL????  This is why I don't read anything Ian writes because it's crap.  He portrays himself as the all professed MJ author when in fact he is just one of the many people trying to cash in on MJ's 'death'.

Find some more articles and from him and read them…this guy is a real piece of work I tell ya…

Another article to toss in the recycle bin!  Woohooo!

DawneVee said:

Ian Helperin is on my 'do not read anything he publishes' list.  So when I seen that UK article aned seen it was written by him I almost left it alone, but then I figured I would read just in case.

Have any of you actually read this article?  Ian claims Michael was a homosexual and had been sleeping with a slew of men and children and would dress up as a woman to go meet men in some crackwhore motel!!

COME ON PEOPLE!!!!  FOR REAL????  This is why I don't read anything Ian writes because it's crap.  He portrays himself as the all professed MJ author when in fact he is just one of the many people trying to cash in on MJ's 'death'.

Find some more articles and from him and read them…this guy is a real piece of work I tell ya…

Another article to toss in the recycle bin!  Woohooo!

i didn't read the article when i saw the name dailymail or whatever. i never bought into the theory in the first place, but now this is an even bigger reason to disregard it.

Post edited 3:36 am – July 17, 2009 by SkylinexBleedsxRed

Finnlady said:

My uncle had a skin cancer and he died after 3 monts, when he was diagnosed for that cancer.

I want to believe that he is alive, but at the same time I have to be realistic.

I can disregard Michael having skin cancer though. Considering he always went outdoors with an umbrella. So, That “cancer” is ruled out for him.

SkylinexBleedsxRed said:

Finnlady said:

My uncle had a skin cancer and he died after 3 monts, when he was diagnosed for that cancer.

I want to believe that he is alive, but at the same time I have to be realistic.

---

I can disregard Michael having skin cancer though considering he always went outdoors with an umbrella.

That's true. Good point.

But there were a lots of rumours that he had a cancer in the beginning of this year and they said that he would have 6 months to live.

Or maybe he had this vitiligo + lupus instead of skin cancer and he took stong painkillers because of that.

http://floacist.wordpress.com/…..r-lupus-2/

Someone explained that when a person dies of a terminal illness, there's no need to investigate the causes. Why should his family insist in saying he died unexpectedely and why the investigations took place? I'm almost sure that we can forget the theory of the “terminal illness”.

jewell said:

no, i don't believe that article at all,

but i do believe it's possible that he could have had cancer ,

or some other terminal illness that he may have been embarrassed about.

he was a private person and probably didn't want to go through cancer with the media…

that would be a nightmare for him and his children.

what a horrible way to spend your last months.

if it is true, i can understand why he would keep it quiet.

many small town nobody's keep their terminal illness quiet and don't tell friends and neighbors.

then everyone is surprised when they die “suddenly”

it also makes sense why some report he was healthy,

and others report he was ill…

i think that it depends on who they saw, MJ or the double.

 THAT'S WHAT I THINK TOO. I don't mean that he's dead for sure, but it was obvious that he wasn't in good health in the last years, some people (i'm not refering to anyone here in particular) don't want to admit it, don't know why. Everybody gets ill, even superstars!

And terminal illnesses sometimes have different periods, one week you're apparently fine, next week you're bad and so (the treatment) but never completely fine…until one day finally you die, I've lived it with a very close person and i see it in more people.

SORRY, I DON'T WANT TO MAKE YOU GIVE UP HOPE! but we must face some real facts.

Post edited 4:54 am – July 17, 2009 by jewell